Presented at the 27th International Symposium on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Motor Neurone Disease, Dublin Ireland, December 2016.

Objectives: We asked, for what types of ALS human clinical trials can concurrent controls, historical controls, and virtual controls be most efficient.

Conclusions: 

  • Historically Controlled Trials (HCTs) are an efficient design when large treatment effects are expected, e.g., >50% improvement
  • The threshold at which HCTs are more efficient than Concurrently Controlled Trials (CCTs) will change as improved prediction of outcomes reduces unexplained trial-to-trial variation
  • Use of HCTs will also be aided by accumulation of additional historical control data as secular trends in ALS care may bias older trials
  • Historically controlled trials are an appropriate design when studying intensive treatments that would require a large treatment effect to be practical

Authors: David A Schoenfeld, Robert Küffner, Eric A Macklin, David L Ennist, Dan H Moore, Neta Zach, Nazem Atassi

 

Schoenfeld-MND-2016-HCTs-poster-20161201b1

 

Download this Poster by Entering Your Email Address Below:

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This